header-logo header-logo

Jury trials under threat

26 November 2025
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The legal profession's leaders have mounted a robust defence of trial by jury, following reports that Justice Secretary David Lammy is considering restricting it to rape, murder, manslaughter and other cases that are in the public interest

The BBC reported this week on an internal government briefing containing plans to create an extra tier of judge-only courts in England and Wales that would cover crimes attracting sentences of up to five years. It would handle most crimes currently heard before a jury. Lammy’s intention is to speed up cases, cutting the unprecedented backlog of 78,000 Crown Court criminal cases, currently unlikely to be heard until 2029 or 2030.

The Ministry of Justice says no decision has been taken by the government.

However, Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘This extreme measure on jury trials goes far beyond the recommendations made by Sir Brian Leveson in his independent report.’

In July, Lord Leveson's Independent Review of the Criminal Courts proposed creating an extra tier of judge-only court, the Crown Court Bench Division, hearing cases where defendants could be sentenced to up to three years in prison.

Evans said: ‘We have not seen any real evidence that expanding the types of cases heard by a single judge will work to reduce the backlogs.

‘The Leveson proposals were an uncomfortable compromise, only justifiable given the extensive challenges our justice system faces. To go beyond Leveson’s proposals is a step too far.’

In an impassioned blogpost on the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) website this week, prior to the BBC report, Riel Karmy-Jones KC, CBA chair, said: ‘Jury trial, in place for hundreds of serious offences, is a right which has been applauded and emulated by other nations.

‘Juries are trusted by ordinary working people—the very people this government repeatedly and pointedly professes to care for, to represent and to keep safe from harm.’

Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll