header-logo header-logo

26 November 2025
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Jury trials under threat

The legal profession's leaders have mounted a robust defence of trial by jury, following reports that Justice Secretary David Lammy is considering restricting it to rape, murder, manslaughter and other cases that are in the public interest

The BBC reported this week on an internal government briefing containing plans to create an extra tier of judge-only courts in England and Wales that would cover crimes attracting sentences of up to five years. It would handle most crimes currently heard before a jury. Lammy’s intention is to speed up cases, cutting the unprecedented backlog of 78,000 Crown Court criminal cases, currently unlikely to be heard until 2029 or 2030.

The Ministry of Justice says no decision has been taken by the government.

However, Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘This extreme measure on jury trials goes far beyond the recommendations made by Sir Brian Leveson in his independent report.’

In July, Lord Leveson's Independent Review of the Criminal Courts proposed creating an extra tier of judge-only court, the Crown Court Bench Division, hearing cases where defendants could be sentenced to up to three years in prison.

Evans said: ‘We have not seen any real evidence that expanding the types of cases heard by a single judge will work to reduce the backlogs.

‘The Leveson proposals were an uncomfortable compromise, only justifiable given the extensive challenges our justice system faces. To go beyond Leveson’s proposals is a step too far.’

In an impassioned blogpost on the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) website this week, prior to the BBC report, Riel Karmy-Jones KC, CBA chair, said: ‘Jury trial, in place for hundreds of serious offences, is a right which has been applauded and emulated by other nations.

‘Juries are trusted by ordinary working people—the very people this government repeatedly and pointedly professes to care for, to represent and to keep safe from harm.’

Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll