header-logo header-logo

Additional powers for HR judges

10 June 2010
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges at the European Court of Human Rights can strike out cases where the applicant has not suffered a “significant disadvantage”, as of this month.

Judges at the European Court of Human Rights can strike out cases where the applicant has not suffered a “significant disadvantage”, as of this month.
The new power can be exercised unless respect for human rights requires an examination of the application on the merits, and provided the case has been considered by a domestic tribunal.

Supporters of the new regime say it will allow the court to concentrate more on cases that “raise important human rights issues, so it can play its role most effectively”.

The change has come about as a result of Protocol No 14 of the European Convention which entered into force at the beginning of the month.
Additionally, judges are now elected to the court for a maximum period of nine years, and may not seek
re-election.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll