header-logo header-logo

10 June 2010
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Additional powers for HR judges

Judges at the European Court of Human Rights can strike out cases where the applicant has not suffered a “significant disadvantage”, as of this month.

Judges at the European Court of Human Rights can strike out cases where the applicant has not suffered a “significant disadvantage”, as of this month.
The new power can be exercised unless respect for human rights requires an examination of the application on the merits, and provided the case has been considered by a domestic tribunal.

Supporters of the new regime say it will allow the court to concentrate more on cases that “raise important human rights issues, so it can play its role most effectively”.

The change has come about as a result of Protocol No 14 of the European Convention which entered into force at the beginning of the month.
Additionally, judges are now elected to the court for a maximum period of nine years, and may not seek
re-election.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll