header-logo header-logo

10 June 2010
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Additional powers for HR judges

Judges at the European Court of Human Rights can strike out cases where the applicant has not suffered a “significant disadvantage”, as of this month.

Judges at the European Court of Human Rights can strike out cases where the applicant has not suffered a “significant disadvantage”, as of this month.
The new power can be exercised unless respect for human rights requires an examination of the application on the merits, and provided the case has been considered by a domestic tribunal.

Supporters of the new regime say it will allow the court to concentrate more on cases that “raise important human rights issues, so it can play its role most effectively”.

The change has come about as a result of Protocol No 14 of the European Convention which entered into force at the beginning of the month.
Additionally, judges are now elected to the court for a maximum period of nine years, and may not seek
re-election.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll