header-logo header-logo

Adjudication for all?

17 March 2021 / C Haward Soper
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Construction
printer mail-detail
42845
Beyond construction: C Haward Soper champions the benefits of statutory adjudication for the resolution of a wide range of disputes
  • Research suggests that fast-track binding adjudication, based on the Construction Act model, would be welcomed by those involved in the management of complex modern contracts.

Statutory adjudication for parties to construction contracts (who cannot contract out of the scheme) came into force in 1998 under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGRA 1996). It provides temporary finality in a 28-day procedure, acts as a ‘pay first, argue later’ mechanism, and is designed to protect the cash flow of often thinly capitalised parties. Other, non-statutory, schemes include those managed by the Society for Computers and Law, the Tenancy Deposit Adjudication Scheme, the Professional Negligence Bar Association scheme and the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution’s scheme (the rules of which provide for a decision to be made based on written submissions within 28 days of a referral).

I suggest that statutory adjudication, based on the HGRA 1996 model, be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll