header-logo header-logo

25 January 2013
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Adoption

A City Council v DC and others [2013] EWHC 8 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 75 (Jan)

The general rule was that any application by a local authority asking the court to exercise its inherent jurisdiction in order to revoke a freeing order should be made in the High Court on notice to the former parents including those former parents who had made a declaration under s 18(6) the Adoption Act 1976. Exceptionally an application might be made without notice. When making such an application the local authority had to file a statement in support giving reasons for seeking a without notice order by reference inter alia to the established principles in relation to without notice applications. Similarly any application to withhold any of the information, which would otherwise be included within the application had to be made subject to principles set out in Re (A Child) [2012] All ER (D) 96 (Dec) and be accompanied by a statement in support of the application. Good practice would require that, if they could be traced, the former parents should

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll