header-logo header-logo

Adoption—Interim order—Injunction

07 July 2011
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re B (children) (adoption) [2011] EWCA Civ 729, [2011] All ER (D) 159 (Jun)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Lord Wilson and Dame Janet Smith, 22 Jun 2011

When short-term foster parents suddenly give notice of intention to adopt their foster child and thus wish to prevent the local authority’s imminent removal of him from their home into the home of prospective adopters pursuant to a placement order, a county court judge has jurisdiction to make an injunction against the local authority’s removal. Further, a child was “placed” for adoption only when he begins to live with the adoptive parents.

Frances Judd QC and Mark Higgins for the local authority. Alistair MacDonald QC and Theresa McCormack for the foster parents. Elizabeth McGrath for the mother. The father did not appear and was not represented. Robin Lewis for the children, by their guardian.

Two questions were before the court: (a) When short-term foster parents suddenly gave notice of intention to adopt their foster child and thus wished to prevent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll