header-logo header-logo

15 December 2023 / Tony Allen
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Opinion , ADR
printer mail-detail

ADR after Churchill

151503
Tony Allen takes an in-depth look at Churchill & considers its impact

Quite the most significant decision for many years, in terms of influencing the development of mediation within civil justice, is to be found in the judgment of a very strong Court of Appeal in Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [2023] EWCA Civ 1416. Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, sat with Lady Chief Justice Carr and Lord Justice Birss, the Deputy Head of Civil Justice, and gave the lead judgment, which in effect reverses the 2004 Court of Appeal’s opinion expressed in Halsey v Milton Keynes NHS Trust [2003] EWCA Civ 576 that for a court to order parties to mediate infringed their Art 6 right to a fair trial. Churchill now gives judicial authority to the view expressed in the Civil Justice Council’s report, ‘Compulsory ADR June 2021’, that courts may order parties to mediate or use other dispute resolution processes even against party objections, ‘provided that the order made does not impair the very essence of the claimant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll