header-logo header-logo

ADR after Churchill

15 December 2023 / Tony Allen
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Opinion , ADR
printer mail-detail
151503
Tony Allen takes an in-depth look at Churchill & considers its impact

Quite the most significant decision for many years, in terms of influencing the development of mediation within civil justice, is to be found in the judgment of a very strong Court of Appeal in Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [2023] EWCA Civ 1416. Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, sat with Lady Chief Justice Carr and Lord Justice Birss, the Deputy Head of Civil Justice, and gave the lead judgment, which in effect reverses the 2004 Court of Appeal’s opinion expressed in Halsey v Milton Keynes NHS Trust [2003] EWCA Civ 576 that for a court to order parties to mediate infringed their Art 6 right to a fair trial. Churchill now gives judicial authority to the view expressed in the Civil Justice Council’s report, ‘Compulsory ADR June 2021’, that courts may order parties to mediate or use other dispute resolution processes even against party objections, ‘provided that the order made does not impair the very essence of the claimant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll