header-logo header-logo

15 December 2023 / Tony Allen
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Opinion , ADR
printer mail-detail

ADR after Churchill

151503
Tony Allen takes an in-depth look at Churchill & considers its impact

Quite the most significant decision for many years, in terms of influencing the development of mediation within civil justice, is to be found in the judgment of a very strong Court of Appeal in Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [2023] EWCA Civ 1416. Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, sat with Lady Chief Justice Carr and Lord Justice Birss, the Deputy Head of Civil Justice, and gave the lead judgment, which in effect reverses the 2004 Court of Appeal’s opinion expressed in Halsey v Milton Keynes NHS Trust [2003] EWCA Civ 576 that for a court to order parties to mediate infringed their Art 6 right to a fair trial. Churchill now gives judicial authority to the view expressed in the Civil Justice Council’s report, ‘Compulsory ADR June 2021’, that courts may order parties to mediate or use other dispute resolution processes even against party objections, ‘provided that the order made does not impair the very essence of the claimant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll