header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
06 September 2007 / Beverley Flynn , Navdeep Gill
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Agent payouts

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The legal protection offered to commercial agents continues to be contentious, say Beverley Flynn and Navdeep Gill

Commercial agents have received legal protection since the mid 1990s by virtue of the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/3053) (the regulations). In general terms, the regulations apply to any self employed agent who has continuing authority to negotiate the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of a principal. The regulations do not apply to unpaid agents or those whose activities are considered to be secondary.
One of the most contentious aspects of the regulations has been the right of commercial agents to claim compensation in certain circumstances upon termination of the relationship.

There have been two recent cases which have dealt with different aspects of the regulations. The first, Crane v Sky In-Home Service Ltd and another [2007] EWHC 66 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 220 (Jan), looked at the application of the secondary test and whether an agent’s activities fell outside of the regulations as a result of those activities being secondary.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll