header-logo header-logo

Aggravated trespass: Keep off the grass

07 October 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7997 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Health & safety , Public
printer mail-detail
96618
Pitch invaders beware: Neil Parpworth examines the aggravated trespass offence on the field of play
  • Under s 68(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, aggravated trespass occurs where the trespasser impacts upon any lawful activity underway on the land in question, including through intimidation, obstruction or disruption.
  • A recent case which saw a YouTube prankster enter the pitch during a test match at The Oval cricket ground was found to fall squarely within the scope of a s 68(1) offence, with the claim that it was done for entertainment purposes proving no defence.

While we ordinarily think of trespass as being a civil law matter, under s 68(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994) it is a summary offence to trespass on land. The ‘aggravated’ nature of the offence, as determined by the intervention of Parliament, relates to its impact on a lawful activity which is being engaged in on the land at the time that the trespass occurs.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll