header-logo header-logo

Agreeing a better way forward

02 August 2018 / Emma Sutton
Issue: 7804 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7804_sutton

Emma Sutton puts the case for the benefits of early settlement in the Court of Protection

  • Delays in listing a case can cause matters to ‘fester’ and the issues in dispute to significantly (and unnecessarily) increase.

The Court of Protection continues to experience a substantial increase in the volume of applications made. Remarkably, between January and March 2018, 8,089 applications and 10,262 orders were made which was the highest quarterly volume seen since the recording of such statistics began.

Unless a case is urgent, parties will often have to wait a significant time for a listing. Although delays clearly reflect the reality of the pressures on the system, there are emotional costs in addition to the financial implications of litigation. In the writer’s experience, delays in listing a case can cause matters to ‘fester’ and the issues in dispute to significantly (and unnecessarily) increase.

Mediation should be at the heart of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, yet it is noticeably underused. Under the Act and the Court of Protection Rules

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll