header-logo header-logo

02 August 2018 / Emma Sutton
Issue: 7804 / Categories: Features , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Agreeing a better way forward

nlj_7804_sutton

Emma Sutton puts the case for the benefits of early settlement in the Court of Protection

  • Delays in listing a case can cause matters to ‘fester’ and the issues in dispute to significantly (and unnecessarily) increase.

The Court of Protection continues to experience a substantial increase in the volume of applications made. Remarkably, between January and March 2018, 8,089 applications and 10,262 orders were made which was the highest quarterly volume seen since the recording of such statistics began.

Unless a case is urgent, parties will often have to wait a significant time for a listing. Although delays clearly reflect the reality of the pressures on the system, there are emotional costs in addition to the financial implications of litigation. In the writer’s experience, delays in listing a case can cause matters to ‘fester’ and the issues in dispute to significantly (and unnecessarily) increase.

Mediation should be at the heart of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, yet it is noticeably underused. Under the Act and the Court of Protection Rules 2017

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll