header-logo header-logo

Ahead of the game?

03 February 2012 / Catherine Barnard , Simon Deakin
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Abolishing the DRA has the potential to inflict long-term damage to UK Plc: Catherine Barnard & Simon Deakin

Reforming the funding of pensions and raising retirement age have been identified as two key ways of addressing the debt crisis. From this point of view, the UK is ahead of the game: last October the statutory default retirement age (DRA) of 65 disappeared for good. Employees can carry on working until they drop, the years in which they receive their pension will (probably) reduce, and they will carry on paying taxes and spending money, all of which is good for the economy. Or is it? We believe that the overnight abolition of the statutory DRA has the potential to cause serious damage to the economy: to the 20% of young people without jobs, to those looking for promotion, and for employers who will now have to fall back on performance management to remove older staff.

Performance management is costly at a number of levels. Many small (and quite a lot of large) businesses

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll