header-logo header-logo

05 May 2017
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Air traffic

Peires v Bickerton’s Aerodromes Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 273, [2017] All ER (D) 90 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal allowed the defendant’s appeal against the judge’s grant of an injunction, restraining certain manoeuvres by helicopters on or above part of its land lying near the claimant’s property and rejecting its defence based on s 76(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1982. The judge had been wrong in confining ‘flight’ in s 76(1) of the Act to lateral travel from one fixed point to another and holding that the precondition of immunity was that flight or ordinary incidents of flight had to be reasonable.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Magic Circle hire strengthens Sharpe Pritchard’s infrastructure finance capability

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin adds corporate crime specialist to growing dispute resolution team

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr Co strengthens private client team with partner appointment

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll