header-logo header-logo

05 June 2026
Issue: 8164 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Unfair dismissal gets a major upgrade

251514
© Getty images
Employers are being urged to prepare now for far-reaching employment law changes taking effect in January 2027

Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves, lecturer in law at York St John University, and Lily Johnston, paralegal at DWF Law, explain how the Employment Rights Act 2025 reduces the qualifying period for ordinary unfair dismissal claims from two years to six months while abolishing the compensation cap entirely.

The authors describe the latter as 'the development nobody anticipated'. Employees hired from July 2026 will gain protection after six months' service, exposing employers to potentially uncapped awards based on actual financial loss.

With government estimates suggesting millions more workers will qualify for protection and thousands of additional tribunal claims each year, probation procedures are set to become 'the new front line' of employment law. Employers are advised to strengthen documentation, manager training and dismissal processes before the reforms arrive. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll