header-logo header-logo

05 June 2026
Issue: 8164 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Unfair dismissal gets a major upgrade

251514
© Getty images
Employers are being urged to prepare now for far-reaching employment law changes taking effect in January 2027

Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves, lecturer in law at York St John University, and Lily Johnston, paralegal at DWF Law, explain how the Employment Rights Act 2025 reduces the qualifying period for ordinary unfair dismissal claims from two years to six months while abolishing the compensation cap entirely.

The authors describe the latter as 'the development nobody anticipated'. Employees hired from July 2026 will gain protection after six months' service, exposing employers to potentially uncapped awards based on actual financial loss.

With government estimates suggesting millions more workers will qualify for protection and thousands of additional tribunal claims each year, probation procedures are set to become 'the new front line' of employment law. Employers are advised to strengthen documentation, manager training and dismissal processes before the reforms arrive. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll