header-logo header-logo

Day one rights: what happened?

251514
© Getty images
Was the promise actually delivered? Robert Hargreaves & Lily Johnston explain why employers must act now
  • The Employment Rights Act 2025 reduces the unfair dismissal qualifying period from two years to six months and abolishes the statutory cap on compensatory awards entirely. Both changes take effect on 1 January 2027.
  • Anyone hired from July 2026 onwards will acquire protection at the six-month mark, and the financial exposure attaching to unfair dismissal claims is fundamentally changed.

When we wrote in these pages in November 2025, the Employment Rights Bill’s headline promise was straightforward: unfair dismissal would become a day-one right, with a statutory ‘initial period of employment’ during which a lighter-touch process would apply (‘Day one rights: a new chapter?’ 175 NLJ 8141, pp11-12).

The Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA 2025) does not deliver that. Parliamentary events in the final weeks of the Bill’s passage produced a framework that is more modest in one respect and considerably more radical in another.

From promise to compromise

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll