header-logo header-logo

Airlines must compensate for lightning strike delays

19 January 2016
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

When lightning strikes cause delays, airlines may have to compensate passengers, the High Court has held, in a case that potentially could lead to 54,000 individual claims.

In Evans v Monarch Airlines Ltd at Reading County Court on 14 January (unreported), Judge Melissa Clarke held that lightning strikes are not one of the “extraordinary circumstances” that excuse airlines from paying flight delay compensation. She awarded the passengers €600 (£450) each for a five hour flight delay.

Under European Flight Delay Regulation EC 261/2004, passengers delayed by three hours or more in the last six years can claim up to €600 compensation, as long as the delay was not caused by extraordinary circumstances. The regulation does not define the term, "extraordinary circumstances".

Bott & Co Solicitors, who acted for Michael Evans, say the ruling could benefit 54,000 delayed passengers, totalling £17.6m in flight delay compensation. This calculation is based on Civil Aviation Authority statistics that 13.5 million passengers in the past six years were delayed for three hours or more, 80% can potentially lead to claims, and 0.5% of delays are caused by lightning.

While the decision is not legally binding, the firm points out that it “is the lead case on the issue of lightning strikes. As such, the decision will be highly persuasive in flight delay cases involving lightning in English and Welsh courts”.

Kevin Clarke, litigation executive at Bott & Co, says: “Bad weather is not the airline’s fault, but the law says it is their responsibility.”

Issue: 7683 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll