header-logo header-logo

Airlines must compensate for lightning strike delays

19 January 2016
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

When lightning strikes cause delays, airlines may have to compensate passengers, the High Court has held, in a case that potentially could lead to 54,000 individual claims.

In Evans v Monarch Airlines Ltd at Reading County Court on 14 January (unreported), Judge Melissa Clarke held that lightning strikes are not one of the “extraordinary circumstances” that excuse airlines from paying flight delay compensation. She awarded the passengers €600 (£450) each for a five hour flight delay.

Under European Flight Delay Regulation EC 261/2004, passengers delayed by three hours or more in the last six years can claim up to €600 compensation, as long as the delay was not caused by extraordinary circumstances. The regulation does not define the term, "extraordinary circumstances".

Bott & Co Solicitors, who acted for Michael Evans, say the ruling could benefit 54,000 delayed passengers, totalling £17.6m in flight delay compensation. This calculation is based on Civil Aviation Authority statistics that 13.5 million passengers in the past six years were delayed for three hours or more, 80% can potentially lead to claims, and 0.5% of delays are caused by lightning.

While the decision is not legally binding, the firm points out that it “is the lead case on the issue of lightning strikes. As such, the decision will be highly persuasive in flight delay cases involving lightning in English and Welsh courts”.

Kevin Clarke, litigation executive at Bott & Co, says: “Bad weather is not the airline’s fault, but the law says it is their responsibility.”

Issue: 7683 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll