header-logo header-logo

All about client reputation

16 February 2022
Issue: 7967 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lawyers aim to ensure client’s reputation doesn’t precede them

Digital media, growth in class actions and a rise in cross-border disputes has made protection of a client’s reputation increasingly important, lawyers believe. Yet the use of specialist public relations (PR) consultants remains low.

Three-fifths of respondents said they consider reputational impact when advising clients and more than three-quarters agreed litigation PR is necessary in a client’s legal strategy, in a Byfield Consultancy survey of corporate counsel, law firm partners, silks, litigation funders and public relations (PR) advisors. However, only eight per cent said they always involve external PR consultants when advising clients.

Byfield highlights in its report, Finding the right line: litigation PR in an evolving dispute ecosystem, published last week that while reputation has always been an important consideration during litigation, several factors are increasing demand. These include the growth in class actions, the speed of news stories in the digital media era and the increasing volume of cross-border disputes, where ‘it is key for litigators, clients and PR advisers to be familiar with the nuances in media culture, litigation practices, reporting restrictions and PR approaches across several jurisdictions’.

Most of the respondents also agreed environmental, social and governance (ESG) will be a dominant theme in future disputes, which adds an extra layer of reputational risk as non-ethical conduct will play out on a public stage, affecting a business’s ability to acquire investment and talent.

While the litigation PR sector is well established in ‘litigious societies’ such as New York, this is not the case in areas newer to dispute resolution, such as Dubai, where clients and the press are more conservative.

Gus Sellito, co-founder of Byfield Consultancy, said: ‘With the increase of media interest, particularly in areas of conduct and ESG, companies and others who are involved in disputes will need to manage the narrative around these “clickbait” issues. Litigation PR will be more important than ever as these issues begin to take centre stage.’

Issue: 7967 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll