header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Bigamy & intestacy

24 October 2025
Issue: 8136 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
233189
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law

The court ruled that Margaret Dinsdale, whose 2017 Las Vegas marriage was void because her husband never divorced his first wife, could still be treated as a ‘spouse’ under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. Master Brightwell’s pragmatic ruling granted her £50,000 interim maintenance and recognised her good-faith marriage and financial dependence.

Rajput warns that the case highlights the costly fallout of informal separations and outdated wills. Her takeaway: always finalise divorces, update testamentary documents and document dependency. In an age of blended families, she concludes, romantic intentions are no substitute for formal legal steps.

Issue: 8136 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll