header-logo header-logo

Two marriages & a funeral

24 October 2025 / Shivi Rajput
Issue: 8136 / Categories: Features , Family , Wills & Probate , Divorce
printer mail-detail
233189
Lessons to learn from a High Court case involving both bigamy & intestacy, by Shivi Rajput
  • In a preliminary ruling in Dinsdale v Fowell, the High Court has held that the deceased’s second wife should be treated as a spouse for the purposes of bringing a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, even though the deceased was still married to his first wife.
  • It serves as a reminder that divorce must be formalised, wills must be kept current, and estate planning must anticipate the complexities of modern family life.

The recent High Court case of Dinsdale v Fowell (PT-2024-000590) has highlighted profound and complex issues at the intersection of family law, inheritance and estate planning. At its heart lies a tragic and legally tangled scenario: James Dinsdale, an accountant and property development business owner, passed away from cancer in October 2020. He left behind two spouses, an adult son and an estate valued at approximately £1.8m with no valid will to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll