header-logo header-logo

03 April 2026 / Nick Smallwood
Issue: 8156 / Categories: Features , Social Media , Technology , Child law , Regulatory , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Under-16s: going offline?

246230

Nick Smallwood weighs up the legal reality of social media bans: what would they mean for platforms, parents & regulators?

  • A growing number of jurisdictions, including Australia and France, are introducing or considering minimum age bans on social media, with the UK now consulting on similar measures.
  • While designed to protect children from harmful content and addictive platform design, bans raise complex issues around scope and enforceability.
  • Stricter age checks would require more data collection, increasing privacy risks and regulatory scrutiny.

A number of countries around the world, including the UK, are currently contemplating social media bans for children. Australia got there first, implementing a ban on under-16s on 10 December 2025, but others are not far behind. In January 2026, the National Assembly in France voted overwhelmingly in favour of a similar ban. In the days before the vote, President Macron made the case for the policy on French TV:

‘Le cerveau de nos enfants et de nos adolescents n’est pas à vendre. Leurs émotions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

Shakespeare Martineau—Serena Eddy

Shakespeare Martineau—Serena Eddy

London restructuring team strengthened by legal director appointment

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll