header-logo header-logo

03 April 2026 / Nick Smallwood
Issue: 8156 / Categories: Features , Social Media , Technology , Child law , Regulatory , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Under-16s: going offline?

246230

Nick Smallwood weighs up the legal reality of social media bans: what would they mean for platforms, parents & regulators?

  • A growing number of jurisdictions, including Australia and France, are introducing or considering minimum age bans on social media, with the UK now consulting on similar measures.
  • While designed to protect children from harmful content and addictive platform design, bans raise complex issues around scope and enforceability.
  • Stricter age checks would require more data collection, increasing privacy risks and regulatory scrutiny.

A number of countries around the world, including the UK, are currently contemplating social media bans for children. Australia got there first, implementing a ban on under-16s on 10 December 2025, but others are not far behind. In January 2026, the National Assembly in France voted overwhelmingly in favour of a similar ban. In the days before the vote, President Macron made the case for the policy on French TV:

‘Le cerveau de nos enfants et de nos adolescents n’est pas à vendre. Leurs émotions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll