header-logo header-logo

03 April 2026
Issue: 8156 / Categories: Legal News , Social Media , Online safety , Technology , Regulatory , Compliance , Data protection
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas

246230
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation

Proponents cite addictive design and exposure to harmful content, while critics warn bans are ‘not… practically enforceable’ and may drive children to riskier platforms. Even defining ‘social media’ is contentious. Stricter age checks would require more personal data, raising privacy risks and regulatory scrutiny. As one regulator put it, ‘relying on users to declare their age… is not enough’.

Whether through GDPR reform or the Online Safety Act, tighter controls, and tougher compliance, appear inevitable.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll