header-logo header-logo

All change?

19 January 2018
Issue: 7777 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail
nlj_7777_cover

The once great office of Lord Chancellor is now seen as a ‘lowly’ position, with a ‘constant revolving door’ of occupants, David Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe, writes in this week’s NLJ.

David Gauke became the sixth Lord Chancellor in six years last week. Previously, David Lidington spent six months in the role, Liz Truss 11 months and Michael Gove one year and four months. Chris Grayling spent two years and eight months as Lord Chancellor.

While welcoming a qualified lawyer to the role Greene said: ‘There was a time when the appointment had a degree of permanence about it. Now that has gone.

‘The Lord Chancellor is seen as just another minister and by all the evidence, a pretty lowly one. The result is that there is a distinct lack of continuity.'

Issue: 7777 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll