header-logo header-logo

17 July 2009 / Louise Curtis
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Human rights , Property
printer mail-detail

All change

Human rights now have relevance in social housing agreements, reports Louise Curtis

In a ground-breaking decision the Court of Appeal confirmed that Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) will have to consider their tenants’ human rights in regard to their housing management and housing allocation function.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) intervened in this case where the Court of Appeal considered whether London and Quadrant Housing Trust (LQHT) should be treated as a public authority for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998).

The Court of Appeal decided after considering a number of factors cumulatively that LQHT in its role established sufficient public flavour to bring it within the concept of public functions for the HRA 1998 test.
As a result of the case, LQHT tenants and tenants of most other housing association/RSL will now be protected by HRA 1998 in the same way as local authority tenants.

Background

Mrs Weaver was a tenant of LQHT, eviction was sought on ground 8 for non-payment of rent. She had had personal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll