header-logo header-logo

05 May 2023 / Natalie Osafo , Joseph Rossello
Issue: 8023 / Categories: Features , Profession , Disclosure , CPR
printer mail-detail

All change on disclosure?

120980
The new landscape for disclosure: Natalie Osafo & Joseph Rossello set out best practice, the court’s expectations & what lies ahead
  • Recent guidance indicates that the courts expect increased cooperation from parties on disclosure.
  • Judges are imposing tougher sanctions on parties who do not comply with the disclosure rules.
  • A cultural change in parties and lawyers’ approach to disclosure is needed to ensure the UK remains attractive for litigating disputes.

The new rules in Practice Direction 57AD (CPR PD 57AD) are now a permanent fixture of the UK’s disclosure regime.

As we make headway into 2023, now is an apt time to review what the courts expect from parties litigating cases under the new regime. Under the pilot scheme, practitioners were given the benefit of the doubt if they breached the rules. But since the Chancellor of the High Court Sir Julian Flaux gave detailed guidance in January on CPR PD 57AD, we are already seeing judges respond with more severe sanctions for any deliberate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll