header-logo header-logo

30 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

All good plans…

web_advertorial_0

Is the NPFF undermining confidence in the planning system, asks Perran Moon

The requirement to streamline planning has been high on the government’s agenda. The Localism Act came into play over two years ago, with the intention of simplifying planning, ensuring that decisions about housing are taken locally. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPFF) sought to increase the supply of new homes and create a framework for local people, together with “accountable councils”, to shape their own distinctive local and neighbourhood plans.

 

Risk associated to planning

Two years in and there are concerns that in fact, the NPPF is undermining confidence in the planning system. With “a presumption in favour of sustainable development” acting as a “golden thread” that runs through plan-making and decision-taking at its core, it can be argued that the NPPF has led to councils being forced to approve ad-hoc planning applications. This in turn has led to uncoordinated, reactive infrastructure and inconsistent approval criteria.

The situation means that there is an increasing risk associated with property purchases in England and Wales.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll