header-logo header-logo

All out war: Brexit & the Chartist movement

01 June 2017
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7748_anon

Could the way in which Vote Leave used its NHS funding pledge during the EU referendum campaign amount to the offence of treason felony?

  • The history & application of s 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848.

In 1848 revolution was sweeping through Europe, in the UK the Chartists were considered to represent a threat: ‘This is the time of trouble for kings and generals … They have had their day … the angel is preparing to pour out the sixth phial, and its outpouring will “prepare the way of the kings of the earth” …Only the throne established in justice is safe. Parliamentary reform is necessary. For it is not the voice of the people that is heard in the House of Commons but the voice of the aristocracy (The Chartists, Perspectives & Legacies, Malcolm Chase, p 104).

Their demands included universal suffrage and the right to a secret ballot. They presented Parliament with a petition that they claimed been signed by 5,700,000 people.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll