header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

All out war: Brexit & the Chartist movement

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
01 June 2017
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7748_anon

Could the way in which Vote Leave used its NHS funding pledge during the EU referendum campaign amount to the offence of treason felony?
  • The history & application of s 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848.

In 1848 revolution was sweeping through Europe, in the UK the Chartists were considered to represent a threat: ‘This is the time of trouble for kings and generals … They have had their day … the angel is preparing to pour out the sixth phial, and its outpouring will “prepare the way of the kings of the earth” …Only the throne established in justice is safe. Parliamentary reform is necessary. For it is not the voice of the people that is heard in the House of Commons but the voice of the aristocracy (The Chartists, Perspectives & Legacies, Malcolm Chase, p 104).

Their demands included universal suffrage and the right to a secret ballot. They presented Parliament with a petition that they claimed been signed by 5,700,000 people.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Housing management and property litigation team bolstered by partner hires

NEWS
Read All
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Failure to deliver in Getty v Stability AI
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
NLJ this week: Spotlight on the Supreme Court in 2025
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
NLJ this week: Mind the registration gap
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll