header-logo header-logo

All in a week’s pay?

28 September 2017 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7763_pigott

Should a week’s pay be calculated to include employer’s pension contributions, asks Charles Pigott

  • The EAT has ruled that the statutory definition of a week’s pay extends to employer’s pension contributions.
  • This decision challenges a long-held orthodoxy that only gross pay should be taken into account when making the required calculations.

In Drossou v University of Sunderland UKEAT/0341/16/130 Mrs Justice Slade has surprised many in the legal community by holding that a week’s pay can include employer’s pension contributions. In this case the calculation of a week’s pay was required to determine the upper limit on the compensatory award for unfair dismissal, but her reasoning is capable of applying to all jurisdictions which use a week’s pay in order to compute employment tribunal awards.

Some industrial relations history

It seems that old orthodoxy about the calculation of a week’s pay can be traced back to a 1993 decision of the Court of Appeal in Port of London Authority v Payne [1994] IRLR 9. The underlying dispute concerned the redundancy of 17 dock

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll