header-logo header-logo

An alternative route

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter advise how employees can make a successful claim for injury to feelings

It is trite law that a claimant who is successful in convincing an employment tribunal that their dismissal was unfair, within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), is not entitled to receive, as part of their compensatory award, any damages for stress or injury to feelings that arise as a result of the manner of their dismissal. The House of Lords, as was, made this point clear in Dunnachie v Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council [2004] UKHL 36, [2004] 3 All ER 1011. The reasoning is that s 123 of ERA 1996, which governs the compensatory award, does not permit recovery of non-financial losses. However, there is a mechanism by which such a claimant could obtain from the court an award of compensation for injury to feelings caused by their dismissal in appropriate circumstances.

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PHA 1997) permits the recovery of compensation by a claimant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll