header-logo header-logo

10 May 2007
Issue: 7272 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Amnesty campaigns for moratorium on executions

The number of people executed in 2006 fell compared to the previous year, says Amnesty International in its annual report on the death penalty.

However, says the human rights organisation, there has been a “disturbing revival of executions” among a minority of countries and it is calling for a halt to all executions and further death sentences.

The report—The Death Penalty Worldwide: Developments in 2006—shows that at least 1,591 people were executed in 25 countries last year. China, Iran, Pakistan, Iraq, Sudan and the US accounted for 91% of all executions carried out in 2006.

For 2005 Amnesty calculated that at least 2,148 people had been executed. However, the organisation warns, the report’s figures are minimum only, as countries like China refuse to publish official execution statistics.
In 2006, 25 countries are known to have carried out executions—three more than the previous year—and Amnesty is concerned that some countries are resorting to capital punishment despite a record of unfair trials and other human rights violations.

Amnesty International UK director, Kate Allen, says: “Last year

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll