header-logo header-logo

27 March 2024
Issue: 8065 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail

An awkward moment in court

District Judge Stephen Harmes has been issued with a sanction of formal advice for misconduct after asking a female advocate in court if she was pregnant

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) found, in asking this personal question of an advocate, DJ Harmes did not treat her with respect and dignity, thus breaching expected standards of behaviour. However, it noted he immediately realised his error, and apologised following the hearing.

The JCIO found DJ Harmes had believed she was finding the hearing difficult, so asked her the question in an attempt to enquire about her wellbeing. It found the question was a genuine error of judgment and was not intended to offend, but was objectively likely to cause embarrassment when asked of a female advocate.

Issue: 8065 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
Calls to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 10 to 14 have been renewed, with the Bar Council arguing the current threshold criminalises children too early and risks pushing them towards lifelong offending
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
back-to-top-scroll