header-logo header-logo

27 March 2024
Issue: 8065 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail

An awkward moment in court

District Judge Stephen Harmes has been issued with a sanction of formal advice for misconduct after asking a female advocate in court if she was pregnant

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) found, in asking this personal question of an advocate, DJ Harmes did not treat her with respect and dignity, thus breaching expected standards of behaviour. However, it noted he immediately realised his error, and apologised following the hearing.

The JCIO found DJ Harmes had believed she was finding the hearing difficult, so asked her the question in an attempt to enquire about her wellbeing. It found the question was a genuine error of judgment and was not intended to offend, but was objectively likely to cause embarrassment when asked of a female advocate.

Issue: 8065 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll