header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Anger over tax U-turn

The chancellor’s U-turn on capital gains tax (CGT) has evoked mixed reactions from lawyers and account­ants, with many complaining that it will complicate the system.

The chancellor’s U-turn on capital gains tax (CGT) has evoked mixed reactions from lawyers and account­ants, with many complaining that it will complicate the system.

Originally Alistair Darling planned to introduce a flat rate of 18% CGT, but was forced to modify the plans after a backlash from business. The chancellor has now announced an Entrepreneurs’ Relief, which introduces a 10% threshold for the first £1m worth of capital gains over a lifetime.

Other changes to the CGT regime include the abolition of both taper relief, which can result in a 10% tax rate, and indexation relief, which avoids tax on inflationary gains. For non-UK domiciled but tax resident individuals, there is a loss of all the CGT advantages on

their offshore assets and trusts.

Lisa Parisi, tax partner at Pinsent Masons, says: “The new Entrepre­neurs’ Relief has been announced as a concession to help ensure that 90% of business sales next year will remain within the 10% tax rate. However, this hides the fact that the new rules will result in a number of inequities and will leave out entirely many of the taxpayers that are fundamental to the success of the UK economy.”

She says that in many cases investment by management share­holders in private equity deals will be in less than 5% of the share capital and they will therefore miss out entirely on this new relief. “The new regime will also penalise long-term entrepreneurs who have held their businesses for many years.

By abolishing [taper and indexa­tion] relief some long-term business owners will find themselves paying tax at a higher rate than they were promised on gains that don’t outstrip inflation,” she adds.

David Kilshaw, head of private client advisory at KPMG in the UK, comments: “The chancellor promised a simplified CGT system, with one tax rate. This announce­ment has killed that hope. The new relief will add complexity, which will add to red tape and costs for business.”

Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ling Ong, London Market FOIL

NLJ Career Profile: Ling Ong, London Market FOIL

Ling Ong, partner at Weightmans and president of London Market FOIL, discusses her biggest inspirations, the challenges of AI and the importance of tackling unconscious bias

DWF—Imogen Francis

DWF—Imogen Francis

Director and head of IP team joins in Birmingham

Penningtons Manches Cooper—five promotions

Penningtons Manches Cooper—five promotions

Firm boosts partnership and costs practice with five senior promotions

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll