header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Anger over tax U-turn

The chancellor’s U-turn on capital gains tax (CGT) has evoked mixed reactions from lawyers and account­ants, with many complaining that it will complicate the system.

The chancellor’s U-turn on capital gains tax (CGT) has evoked mixed reactions from lawyers and account­ants, with many complaining that it will complicate the system.

Originally Alistair Darling planned to introduce a flat rate of 18% CGT, but was forced to modify the plans after a backlash from business. The chancellor has now announced an Entrepreneurs’ Relief, which introduces a 10% threshold for the first £1m worth of capital gains over a lifetime.

Other changes to the CGT regime include the abolition of both taper relief, which can result in a 10% tax rate, and indexation relief, which avoids tax on inflationary gains. For non-UK domiciled but tax resident individuals, there is a loss of all the CGT advantages on

their offshore assets and trusts.

Lisa Parisi, tax partner at Pinsent Masons, says: “The new Entrepre­neurs’ Relief has been announced as a concession to help ensure that 90% of business sales next year will remain within the 10% tax rate. However, this hides the fact that the new rules will result in a number of inequities and will leave out entirely many of the taxpayers that are fundamental to the success of the UK economy.”

She says that in many cases investment by management share­holders in private equity deals will be in less than 5% of the share capital and they will therefore miss out entirely on this new relief. “The new regime will also penalise long-term entrepreneurs who have held their businesses for many years.

By abolishing [taper and indexa­tion] relief some long-term business owners will find themselves paying tax at a higher rate than they were promised on gains that don’t outstrip inflation,” she adds.

David Kilshaw, head of private client advisory at KPMG in the UK, comments: “The chancellor promised a simplified CGT system, with one tax rate. This announce­ment has killed that hope. The new relief will add complexity, which will add to red tape and costs for business.”

Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll