header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Anger over tax U-turn

The chancellor’s U-turn on capital gains tax (CGT) has evoked mixed reactions from lawyers and account­ants, with many complaining that it will complicate the system.

The chancellor’s U-turn on capital gains tax (CGT) has evoked mixed reactions from lawyers and account­ants, with many complaining that it will complicate the system.

Originally Alistair Darling planned to introduce a flat rate of 18% CGT, but was forced to modify the plans after a backlash from business. The chancellor has now announced an Entrepreneurs’ Relief, which introduces a 10% threshold for the first £1m worth of capital gains over a lifetime.

Other changes to the CGT regime include the abolition of both taper relief, which can result in a 10% tax rate, and indexation relief, which avoids tax on inflationary gains. For non-UK domiciled but tax resident individuals, there is a loss of all the CGT advantages on

their offshore assets and trusts.

Lisa Parisi, tax partner at Pinsent Masons, says: “The new Entrepre­neurs’ Relief has been announced as a concession to help ensure that 90% of business sales next year will remain within the 10% tax rate. However, this hides the fact that the new rules will result in a number of inequities and will leave out entirely many of the taxpayers that are fundamental to the success of the UK economy.”

She says that in many cases investment by management share­holders in private equity deals will be in less than 5% of the share capital and they will therefore miss out entirely on this new relief. “The new regime will also penalise long-term entrepreneurs who have held their businesses for many years.

By abolishing [taper and indexa­tion] relief some long-term business owners will find themselves paying tax at a higher rate than they were promised on gains that don’t outstrip inflation,” she adds.

David Kilshaw, head of private client advisory at KPMG in the UK, comments: “The chancellor promised a simplified CGT system, with one tax rate. This announce­ment has killed that hope. The new relief will add complexity, which will add to red tape and costs for business.”

Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll