header-logo header-logo

Annual risk outlook: trouble ahead?

24 November 2020
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail
Law firms must be more vigilant than ever during COVID-19, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned

Law firms must be more vigilant than ever during COVID-19, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned.

The SRA’s annual Risk Outlook (bit.ly/3m5mJJX), published this week, highlights a rise in money laundering and cybercrime attacks during the first half of 2020, and predicts these threats will increase next year. In the first two months of lockdown, there was a 300% increase in phishing scams, and the SRA predicts similar spikes in future as COVID vaccines become available.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, said the pandemic had ‘exacerbated many of the wider, day-to-day risks faced by law firms and their clients’.

Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll