header-logo header-logo

Antarctica: no man’s land… for now?

08 October 2021 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
60027
Mark Pawlowski considers some of the problems associated with territorial claims to Antarctica

Below 60 degrees latitude lies the immense continent of Antarctica. It covers almost one-tenth of the Earth’s surface and supports the greatest mass of ice in the world. Its isolation, the stormy nature of the intervening seas and, above all, Antarctica’s extreme climate, explain why it has been difficult to reach and explore until relatively modern times. It has also posed a challenge to traditional international law because its unique features make it impossible to apply the usual methods for establishing (and perfecting) claims of territorial sovereignty.

Antarctica currently has no permanent population and, therefore, it has no citizenship nor government. Personnel present in Antarctica at any time are almost always citizens or nationals of some sovereignty outside Antarctica, as there is no Antarctic sovereignty.

Sovereignty problems

Historically, if newly-found lands were res nullius (ie belonging to no one), then a discoverer could claim them in the name of their sovereign. Discovery alone, however, produced only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll