header-logo header-logo

Apology without liability

10 April 2024
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Compensation
printer mail-detail
A consultation on ‘the law of apologies’ has been launched this week by the Ministry of Justice
The paper, ‘Reforming the law of apologies in civil proceedings’, looks at s 2 of the Compensation Act 2006, which allows organisations to apologise without admitting liability. It will consider whether the current legislation is adequate. Justice minister Lord Bellamy KC, in the foreword, writes: ‘Given that there is little empirical evidence, either in England and Wales or abroad, we would be interested to know real world examples of apologies.’ The consultation, which ends on 3 June, also brings forward an Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse recommendation on vicarious liability.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll