header-logo header-logo

Apology without liability

10 April 2024
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Compensation
printer mail-detail
A consultation on ‘the law of apologies’ has been launched this week by the Ministry of Justice
The paper, ‘Reforming the law of apologies in civil proceedings’, looks at s 2 of the Compensation Act 2006, which allows organisations to apologise without admitting liability. It will consider whether the current legislation is adequate. Justice minister Lord Bellamy KC, in the foreword, writes: ‘Given that there is little empirical evidence, either in England and Wales or abroad, we would be interested to know real world examples of apologies.’ The consultation, which ends on 3 June, also brings forward an Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse recommendation on vicarious liability.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
Peter Kandler’s honorary KC marks long-overdue recognition of a man who helped prise open a closed legal world. In NLJ this week, Roger Smith, columnist and former director of JUSTICE, traces how Kandler founded the UK’s first law centre in 1970, challenging a profession that was largely seen as 'fixers for the rich and apologists for criminals'
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll