header-logo header-logo

Appeal

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Sumukan Ltd v Commonwealth Secretariat [2007] EWCA Civ 243, [2007] All ER (D) 341 (Mar)

(i) The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the High Court about the existence of an agreement excluding the right of appeal under the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996), s 69(1). There is a distinction between those cases where the court is assisting or overseeing the
arbitration process and those cases where the question is whether or not the jurisdiction of the court has been excluded. In the context of s 69, there is a distinction between a decision about whether or not the parties have agreed to exclude the court and—if they have not—the decision about whether or not to grant or refuse permission to appeal. Until the court has decided whether or not there is an exclusion agreement, it does not engage on the considerations relevant to the question whether or not permission to appeal should be refused or granted.

(ii) As a matter of domestic law, a contract might incorporate by reference an exclusion agreement limiting the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll