header-logo header-logo

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Appeal

Sumukan Ltd v Commonwealth Secretariat [2007] EWCA Civ 243, [2007] All ER (D) 341 (Mar)

(i) The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the High Court about the existence of an agreement excluding the right of appeal under the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996), s 69(1). There is a distinction between those cases where the court is assisting or overseeing the
arbitration process and those cases where the question is whether or not the jurisdiction of the court has been excluded. In the context of s 69, there is a distinction between a decision about whether or not the parties have agreed to exclude the court and—if they have not—the decision about whether or not to grant or refuse permission to appeal. Until the court has decided whether or not there is an exclusion agreement, it does not engage on the considerations relevant to the question whether or not permission to appeal should be refused or granted.

(ii) As a matter of domestic law, a contract might incorporate by reference an exclusion agreement limiting the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll