header-logo header-logo

Appeal court clears air on community design rights

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

News

The first ruling on the scope of the Registered Community Design Right  (CDR) has been handed down by the Court of Appeal.

Bird & Bird, which acted for Reckitt Benckiser in its high-profile dispute with Procter & Gamble says the case has major significance for designers and brands worldwide.

Bird & Bird partner, Lorna Brazell, says the case is groundbreaking as this is the first authoritative guidance on the CDR and has also set an important precedent in Europe, clarifying for the first time what constitutes the protection available to an original design.

In February 2006, Procter & Gamble sued Reckitt Benckiser over the design of the container of its air freshener Air Wick Odour Stop, claiming it infringed the Registered Community Design which it had obtained for its Febreze product.

The High Court ruled in favour of Procter & Gamble, finding that the two designs were too similar, but the appeal court this week overruled this decision asserting that  there was sufficient difference of detail between them. 

Brazell says the decision is important for all brand owners and all those involved in consumer product industries where the use of designs is paramount.

“We now have clear guidance on what protection an original design can attract and significantly a systematic approach to get there.”

Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll