header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
24 October 2025
Issue: 8136 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
233324
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?

The High Court has ruled that unqualified employees cannot perform ‘conduct of litigation’—even under supervision—because the Legal Services Act 2007 allows only authorised persons to take formal steps such as issuing or serving proceedings. The judgment could prompt objections to work done by unauthorised fee-earners and challenges to costs recovery. Firms must now show clear supervision records proving an authorised lawyer retained control.

The authors urge immediate reviews of delegation practices and careful documentation, predicting further litigation to clarify the limits. Their message: prudence, paperwork and authorised oversight are now essential safeguards.

Issue: 8136 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES
 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
NLJ this week: Clarity on cladding
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
NLJ this week: Self-disclosure risks & rewards
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll