header-logo header-logo

31 January 2013
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

Appeal Court "undermines" Jackson

A landmark Court of Appeal costs case "gives litigants carte blanche to ignore the new rules", costs lawyers and defendant lawyers have said.

The Court held there was “good reason” for claimant Sylvia Henry to go over her approved costs budget by more than £268,000, in her successful defamation suit against The Sun newspaper, in Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 19.

Parties to a civil action will need to prepare a detailed costs budget and stick to it from 1 April, when Lord Justice Jackson’s costs reforms come into force.

Henry’s lawyers failed to comply with a practice direction requiring regular communications between each side’s solicitors on the costs budget, but were otherwise thought by the judge to have incurred "reasonable and proportionate" costs.

In his judgment, Lord Justice Moore-Bick said “good reason” was “likely to depend on, among other things, how the proceedings have been managed, whether they have developed in a way that was not foreseen when the relevant case management orders were made, whether the costs incurred are proportionate to what is in issue and whether the parties have been on an equal footing”.

However, Iain Stark, chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL), said: “This ruling gives litigants carte blanche to ignore the new rules – and satellite litigation is certain to follow.

“Post April it looks like we will be waiting, as in the bad old days of the ‘Costs War’, for cases to reach the Court of Appeal, thus paralysing the courts underneath and the everyday administration of justice. This will produce greater uncertainty, exactly what these reforms were supposed to stop.”

Rod Evans, President of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) said the Court had “seemingly undermined the implementation of the Jackson reforms”.

Rani Mina, partner at Mayer Brown, said: “This decision, the very first we have on cost budgeting, is not the strong message that was widely expected from the Court of Appeal ahead of the implementation of the Jackson reforms in April. 

“One of Lord Justice Jackson’s concerns was that his reforms should not increase the level of satellite litigation over costs.  This decision must surely increase the likelihood of appeals in relation to tough cost budgeting decisions at first instance.” 

Henry, a senior social worker at Haringey Council, was subjected to a fierce and defamatory campaign by The Sun following the death of the child known as Baby P. The newspaper later accepted its statements contained no truth whatsoever, and published an apology.
 

Issue: 7546 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Commercial property and child law teams expand with senior hires

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Set expands London and Singapore offering with senior international disputes hires

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Firm strengthens real estate and litigation teams with partner promotions

NEWS
Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales
The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber
Artificial intelligence, proportionality and public decision-making are under increasing judicial scrutiny, according to the latest public law round-up from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
Families relying on informal agreements over property ownership could face costly consequences if disputes arise, the High Court has warned
back-to-top-scroll