header-logo header-logo

Arbitration

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Dolphin Tanker Srl v Westport Petroleum Inc [2010] EWHC 2617 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 199 (Oct)

It was established law that the general rule on an appeal from an arbitration award on a point of law was that only the award and the relevant contract should be put before the court. That rule applied whether the appeal was brought by agreement under s 69(2)(a) of the Act or leave under s 69(2)(b) of the Act, since in each case the appeal to the court had to be on a question of law arising from the award. An appeal on a question of law was confined to facts found by the award. It was irrelevant whether the court considered those findings of fact to be wrong. There was a confined category of case where either the award had set out the relevant contractual terms in an abbreviated form, or had summarised the effect of an identified contractual exchange or had identified particular documents as having contractual effect without setting out their terms. Those were circumstances in which it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll