header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Dolphin Tanker Srl v Westport Petroleum Inc [2010] EWHC 2617 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 199 (Oct)

It was established law that the general rule on an appeal from an arbitration award on a point of law was that only the award and the relevant contract should be put before the court. That rule applied whether the appeal was brought by agreement under s 69(2)(a) of the Act or leave under s 69(2)(b) of the Act, since in each case the appeal to the court had to be on a question of law arising from the award. An appeal on a question of law was confined to facts found by the award. It was irrelevant whether the court considered those findings of fact to be wrong. There was a confined category of case where either the award had set out the relevant contractual terms in an abbreviated form, or had summarised the effect of an identified contractual exchange or had identified particular documents as having contractual effect without setting out their terms. Those were circumstances in which it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll