header-logo header-logo

24 March 2011
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Claxton Engineering Services Ltd v TXM Olaj-Es Gazkutato KTF, [2011] EWHC 345 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 169 (Mar)

The exercise of the court’s discretion to grant an anti-arbitration injunction should generally only be done in exceptional circumstances, although it was nevertheless clear that the courts had jurisdiction to grant such injunctions. The need for caution in the grant of such injunctions was all the greater in relation to arbitrations outside the jurisdiction because such matters were generally best left to the relevant supervisory courts being the courts of the country of the seat of the arbitration.

In order to establish exceptional circumstances, it would usually be necessary, as a minimum, to establish that the applicant’s legal or equitable rights had been infringed or threatened by a continuation of the arbitration, or that its continuation would be vexatious, oppressive or unconscionable, those being the principles which governed the grant of injunctions to restrain proceedings in a foreign court. However, that might not be sufficient.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll