header-logo header-logo

27 October 2021
Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Climate change litigation , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Arbitration at COP26?

Adoption of the ‘arbitration annex’ at COP26, in Glasgow next week, would encourage states to act on their climate and environmental obligations, according to lawyers
COP26 is the 26th meeting of parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Writing in a paper for LexisNexis, ‘COP26―the road to net zero’, Pinsent Masons partner Pamela McDonald said she hoped there would be discussion on arbitration at the conference.

The Paris Agreement set emissions targets but ‘implementation and enforcement mechanisms under both the agreement and the UNFCCC are either absent or weak’, she wrote. While the Paris Agreement allowed states to declare they accepted arbitration in accordance with procedures in an ‘annex on arbitration’, adoption of the annex ‘would provide a vital means of ensuring the Paris Agreement is respected’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll