header-logo header-logo

27 October 2021
Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Climate change litigation , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Arbitration at COP26?

Adoption of the ‘arbitration annex’ at COP26, in Glasgow next week, would encourage states to act on their climate and environmental obligations, according to lawyers
COP26 is the 26th meeting of parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Writing in a paper for LexisNexis, ‘COP26―the road to net zero’, Pinsent Masons partner Pamela McDonald said she hoped there would be discussion on arbitration at the conference.

The Paris Agreement set emissions targets but ‘implementation and enforcement mechanisms under both the agreement and the UNFCCC are either absent or weak’, she wrote. While the Paris Agreement allowed states to declare they accepted arbitration in accordance with procedures in an ‘annex on arbitration’, adoption of the annex ‘would provide a vital means of ensuring the Paris Agreement is respected’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll