header-logo header-logo

Arbitration—Award—Appeal

11 November 2010
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Guangzhou Dockyards Company Ltd v E N E Aegiali I [2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) (Nov)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Blair J, 5 Nov 2010
It is established law that s 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) provides only for an appeal to the court on a question of law, and the parties cannot by agreement create jurisdiction for an appeal against factual findings under it.
Robert Bright QC and Charles Holroyd (instructed by Reed Smith)
for the dockyard. Bernard Eder QC and Sean O’Sullivan (instructed by Ince & Co) for the owners.

The proceedings concerned a contract between Greek shipowners and a Chinese dockyard for the conversion of the former’s vessel. The contract was governed by English law and provided for London arbitration subject to London Maritime Arbitrators’ Association rules and AA 1996. The clause provided that the parties could appeal to the High Court “on any issue arising out of any award.” In the event, the work could not be performed and a dispute arose as to the cause. The tribunal ruled in favour of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll