header-logo header-logo

11 November 2010
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Arbitration—Award—Appeal

Guangzhou Dockyards Company Ltd v E N E Aegiali I [2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) (Nov)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Blair J, 5 Nov 2010
It is established law that s 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) provides only for an appeal to the court on a question of law, and the parties cannot by agreement create jurisdiction for an appeal against factual findings under it.
Robert Bright QC and Charles Holroyd (instructed by Reed Smith)
for the dockyard. Bernard Eder QC and Sean O’Sullivan (instructed by Ince & Co) for the owners.

The proceedings concerned a contract between Greek shipowners and a Chinese dockyard for the conversion of the former’s vessel. The contract was governed by English law and provided for London arbitration subject to London Maritime Arbitrators’ Association rules and AA 1996. The clause provided that the parties could appeal to the High Court “on any issue arising out of any award.” In the event, the work could not be performed and a dispute arose as to the cause. The tribunal ruled in favour

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll