header-logo header-logo

24 February 2023 / Alexander G Fessas
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration , Diversity , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Arbitration: delivering on diversity

112059
Diversity in arbitration optimises outcomes both in the boardroom & the hearing room: Alexander G Fessas explains how the ICC International Court of Arbitration is creating positive change

  • With studies suggesting that increased diversity leads to better outcomes in arbitration proceedings, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) International Court of Arbitration has implemented a number of innovative policies to increase the diversity of its memberships and appointments.
  • As it celebrates its 100th year, the ICC Court has pledged further action to build on its efforts towards diversity, equity and inclusion.

It is often said that, if arbitration is to retain its prominence as a preferred method to resolve commercial disputes, we must embrace the relevance of diversity in today’s world, acknowledge the steps made towards increased diversity in arbitration, and, importantly, take further action.

Superior value

The issue is not new. Studies indicate that diverse corporate teams are more profitable and more likely to create superior value. With regard to arbitration specifically, surveys suggest that greater diversity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll