header-logo header-logo

Arbitration: delivering on diversity

24 February 2023 / Alexander G Fessas
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration , Diversity , Career focus
printer mail-detail
112059
Diversity in arbitration optimises outcomes both in the boardroom & the hearing room: Alexander G Fessas explains how the ICC International Court of Arbitration is creating positive change

  • With studies suggesting that increased diversity leads to better outcomes in arbitration proceedings, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) International Court of Arbitration has implemented a number of innovative policies to increase the diversity of its memberships and appointments.
  • As it celebrates its 100th year, the ICC Court has pledged further action to build on its efforts towards diversity, equity and inclusion.

It is often said that, if arbitration is to retain its prominence as a preferred method to resolve commercial disputes, we must embrace the relevance of diversity in today’s world, acknowledge the steps made towards increased diversity in arbitration, and, importantly, take further action.

Superior value

The issue is not new. Studies indicate that diverse corporate teams are more profitable and more likely to create superior value. With regard to arbitration specifically, surveys suggest that greater diversity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll