header-logo header-logo

06 September 2023
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

Arbitration reforms announced

The Law Commission has recommended a series of reforms to the Arbitration Act 1996, including extending immunity so that arbitrators are protected from liability when they resign or are removed.

The commission, which published its final recommendations and draft legislation this week following an 18-month review, said strengthened immunity would support the arbitrator to make robust and impartial decisions without the fear of being sued.

Other recommendations include codifying the law on arbitrators’ duty to disclose conflicts of interest while retaining current duties on impartiality. The commission suggested arbitrators be able to summarily dismiss legal claims that lack merit. It recommended clarifying the power of the courts to support arbitration proceedings and emergency arbitrators, as well as improvements to the framework for challenging jurisdiction.

In terms of disputes between parties over the governing law that should apply, the commission recommended a default rule in favour of the law of the seat. The commission said this would ‘have the virtues of simplicity and certainty’ and ‘would see more arbitration agreements governed by the law of England and Wales, when those arbitrations are also seated here’.

Overall, however, the commission concluded the central tenets of the Act continue to function well. It considered whether to introduce provisions on confidentiality, but decided there was no need for reform as the law is working well.

Law commissioner Professor Sarah Green said: ‘With these improvements, we hope that the Act provides a modern and effective legislative framework for many years to come, enabling arbitration to continue playing a significant role in the UK economy.’

Nick Vineall KC, chair of the Bar Council, expressed support for the proposals and welcomed the commission’s ‘characteristically careful and balanced review’.

Vineall said: ‘It is extremely important that the government finds parliamentary time for the short Bill which the Law Commission proposes.

‘London has a well-deserved reputation as the foremost centre for international arbitration. It is important to legislate to make the modest changes to the arbitration regime which the Law Commission has recommended in order to maintain and enhance that reputation.’

Justice minister Lord Bellamy said the government would respond shortly to the recommendations.

Issue: 8039 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll