header-logo header-logo

06 September 2023
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

Arbitration reforms announced

The Law Commission has recommended a series of reforms to the Arbitration Act 1996, including extending immunity so that arbitrators are protected from liability when they resign or are removed.

The commission, which published its final recommendations and draft legislation this week following an 18-month review, said strengthened immunity would support the arbitrator to make robust and impartial decisions without the fear of being sued.

Other recommendations include codifying the law on arbitrators’ duty to disclose conflicts of interest while retaining current duties on impartiality. The commission suggested arbitrators be able to summarily dismiss legal claims that lack merit. It recommended clarifying the power of the courts to support arbitration proceedings and emergency arbitrators, as well as improvements to the framework for challenging jurisdiction.

In terms of disputes between parties over the governing law that should apply, the commission recommended a default rule in favour of the law of the seat. The commission said this would ‘have the virtues of simplicity and certainty’ and ‘would see more arbitration agreements governed by the law of England and Wales, when those arbitrations are also seated here’.

Overall, however, the commission concluded the central tenets of the Act continue to function well. It considered whether to introduce provisions on confidentiality, but decided there was no need for reform as the law is working well.

Law commissioner Professor Sarah Green said: ‘With these improvements, we hope that the Act provides a modern and effective legislative framework for many years to come, enabling arbitration to continue playing a significant role in the UK economy.’

Nick Vineall KC, chair of the Bar Council, expressed support for the proposals and welcomed the commission’s ‘characteristically careful and balanced review’.

Vineall said: ‘It is extremely important that the government finds parliamentary time for the short Bill which the Law Commission proposes.

‘London has a well-deserved reputation as the foremost centre for international arbitration. It is important to legislate to make the modest changes to the arbitration regime which the Law Commission has recommended in order to maintain and enhance that reputation.’

Justice minister Lord Bellamy said the government would respond shortly to the recommendations.

Issue: 8039 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll