header-logo header-logo

05 November 2025
Issue: 8138 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Double review on whiplash and fixed costs

Two separate post-implementation reviews are being held into the extension of fixed recoverable costs for personal injury claims and the whiplash regime

However, the Law Society has warned the consultation period is too short.

This week, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee launched a consultation on the extension of fixed recoverable costs in October 2023 from low-value claims only to cover most intermediate and fast track claims. The consultation closes on 5 January.

Law Society vice president Brett Dixon said: ‘We are concerned that the deadline for responses is very short.

‘It coincides with the call for evidence for the whiplash review and includes the Christmas break. We hope this gives government enough time to gather enough responses.’

Last week, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) launched a post-implementation review of its whiplash policies, covering fixed tariffs, the Official Injury Claim portal, statutory definition of the injury, ban on settling cases without medical evidence and small claims limit. An MoJ call for evidence will close on 22 December, with the review due to be published in the spring.

Reforms to whiplash injury claims were introduced seven years ago by Part 1 of the Civil Liability Act 2018. Fixed tariffs were introduced where the injury or injuries lasted less than two years. Insurers and claimants were barred from settling claims before medical evidence had been produced. At the same time, the threshold for the small claims track was raised from £1,000 to £5,000 for road traffic accident claims, bringing many more cases within its remit.

Dixon said the portal got off to ‘a challenging start.

‘We remain concerned about the length of time it takes to resolve road traffic claims, particularly those involving whiplash injuries. With average settlement times now reported to be exceeding 600 days, there are serious questions about how cases are being managed within the portal.’

Issue: 8138 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
back-to-top-scroll