header-logo header-logo

08 November 2017
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Insurance / reinsurance , Arbitration , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration—Reinsurance

Tonicstar Ltd (on its own behalf and on behalf of the other corporate members of Lloyd's Syndicates 62, 1861 and 2255) v Allianz Insurance plc (Formerly Cornhill Insurance plc) and another [2017] EWHC 2753 (Comm), [2017] All ER (D) 46 (Nov)

The court had the power to remove an arbitrator on the grounds that he did not possess the necessary qualifications, pursuant to s 24(1) of the Arbitration Act 1996. Further, applying settled law, a Queen's Counsel, with considerable experience as a lawyer in insurance and reinsurance disputes, was not qualified to act as an arbitrator, within the meaning of cl 15.5 of a contract of reinsurance (incorporating the Joint Excess Loss Committee excess loss clauses). Where cl 15.5 had been adopted, the tribunal was to consist of persons from the trade or business of insurance and reinsurance. The Commercial Court so ruled in granting the claimant's application for an order that a QC be removed as an arbitrator on the ground that he was not qualified to act as such. The application arose out of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll