header-logo header-logo

Arbitrator challenges: the long view

15 June 2018 / Eleanor Scogings , Hanna Roos , Philip Clifford KC
Issue: 7797 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
nlj_7797_clifford

Philip Clifford QC, Hanna Roos & Eleanor Scogings track the nature & trends of two decades of arbitrator challenges

  • An analysis of LCIA court and English court decisions on challenges to arbitrators between 1996 and 2017 reveals a robust and consistent approach.

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) recently published 32 anonymised summaries of arbitrator challenges decided by the LCIA during the period 2010 to 2017, supplementing the previous publication of 28 decisions from 1996 to 2010. When analysed together with applications to the English court to remove arbitrators brought between 1996 and 2017, it is evident that both the LCIA court and the English court have dealt with challenges robustly and consistently.

An overview

The majority of the challenge decisions reviewed were brought under Article 10.3 of the 1998 LCIA Arbitration Rules, on the ground that there were justifiable doubts as to the arbitrators’ independence or impartiality. However, there were also a significant number of challenges under Article 10.2, on the grounds that the arbitrators deliberately violated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll