header-logo header-logo

10 August 2012 / Michael Cook
Issue: 7526 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Arcane pricing & practices

Michael Cook confronts the ghost of hourly billing

Adam Sampson, the Legal Ombudsman, wrote in The Guardian that for too long lawyers have got away with “arcane pricing and billing practices” (“Lawyers beware: your clients are rebelling”, 6 March 2012). He continued: “Protected by their social status, political power and deliberately obfuscatory language, lawyers have hitherto been able to ignore the notion of customer service…Nowhere is the battle between the traditional view of client and customer more marked than in the notion of pricing…Law firms who seem incapable of working on a fixed costs model for individual clients appear far more willing to do so for insurers and the Legal Services Commission.”

According to the Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger, addressing the Association of Costs Lawyers on 11 May: “Hourly billing at best leads to inefficient practices, at worst it rewards and incentivises inefficiency. Moreover, it undermines effective competition in the provision of legal services, as it ‘penalises...well run legal business whose systems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll