header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7526

09 August 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

How can a balance be struck between protecting investigative journalism & safeguarding the public, asks Iain Goldrein QC

David Burrows counts the costs in care proceedings

Ian Smith signs off for the summer with a whiff of controversy & a judicial blast

Lucinda Brown examines a charitable approach to litigation

Property contracts must be watertight, warns Siobhan Jones

Tim Spencer-Lane examines recent case law involving the community care responsibilities of local councils

Grey areas still exist at the boundaries of vicarious liability, notes Richard Scorer

Bill Gibson puts matters of interest under the spotlight in his special NLJ series on costs

Michael Cook confronts the ghost of hourly billing

Drysdale v Hedges [2012] All ER (D) 345 (Jul)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The government has pledged to ‘move fast’ to protect children from harm caused by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, and could impose limits on social media as early as the summer
All eyes will be on the Court of Appeal (or its YouTube livestream) next week as it sits to consider the controversial Mazur judgment
An NHS Foundation Trust breached a consultant’s contract by delegating an investigation into his knowledge of nurse Lucy Letby’s case
Draft guidance for schools on how to support gender-questioning pupils provides ‘more clarity’, but headteachers may still need legal advice, an education lawyer has said
Litigation funder Innsworth Capital, which funded behemoth opt-out action Merricks v Mastercard, can bring a judicial review, the High Court ruled last week
back-to-top-scroll