NG International Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2012] UKUT 259 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 375 (Jul)
MA v JA [2012] EWCH 2219 (Fam), [2012] All ER (D) 338 (Jul)
ebookers.com Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände—Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV: C-112/11, [2012] All ER (D) 368 (Jul)
Bridgeman v Associated British Ports UKEAT/0425/11/JOJ, [2012] All ER (D) 18 (Aug)
A Local Authority v A mother and others [2012] EWHC 1637 (Fam), [2012] All ER (D) 11 (Aug)
Interclass Holdings Ltd and another v Office of Fair Trading [2012] EWCA Civ 1056, [2012] All ER (D) 358 (Jul)
This is an estimable work which no family finance practitioner should be without.
HLE blogger James Wilson analyses a legislation lament
Civil Justice Council calls for contingency fees across the board
Warning over impact of justice reforms on judiciary
Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating
West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire
Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London
The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ