header-logo header-logo

10 August 2012 / Lucinda Brown
Issue: 7526 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Walking a fine line

istock_000004137971medium_4

Lucinda Brown examines a charitable approach to litigation

To defend or not to defend? That is the question posed to charities facing claims against an estate of which they are a legatee. The decision is not a straightforward one. The trustees of the charity must balance the duty to ensure that the charity receives the monies that are due to it against the time, resources and costs that will be incurred in litigating to protect the legacy. Adverse publicity can act as a deterrent to charities who are considering defending claims as they seek to avoid the perception that their defence has caused the case to go to trial.

No special treatment

Charities are not given any preferential status by the court and legacies to charities are just as vulnerable as ordinary legacies in contested estates. Claims disputing the validity of wills, claims for rectification of wills and claims pursuant to the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) can all give rise to the possibility that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll