header-logo header-logo

Walking a fine line

10 August 2012 / Lucinda Brown
Issue: 7526 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
istock_000004137971medium_4

Lucinda Brown examines a charitable approach to litigation

To defend or not to defend? That is the question posed to charities facing claims against an estate of which they are a legatee. The decision is not a straightforward one. The trustees of the charity must balance the duty to ensure that the charity receives the monies that are due to it against the time, resources and costs that will be incurred in litigating to protect the legacy. Adverse publicity can act as a deterrent to charities who are considering defending claims as they seek to avoid the perception that their defence has caused the case to go to trial.

No special treatment

Charities are not given any preferential status by the court and legacies to charities are just as vulnerable as ordinary legacies in contested estates. Claims disputing the validity of wills, claims for rectification of wills and claims pursuant to the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) can all give rise to the possibility that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll