header-logo header-logo

Archaic, unclear & unfair?

03 July 2009 / Peter J Tyldesley
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Part one: Consumer insurance law reform is long overdue, says Peter J Tyldesley

Later this year the English and Scottish Law Commissions will publish a joint final report on consumer insurance law. This is the culmination of a four-year project to review an area of law which is widely regarded as archaic, unclear and unfair. It is anticipated that the report will recommend reform of the rules on non‑disclosure, misrepresentation and breach of warranty.

The critical flaw in insurance law is that it provides insurers with remedies which in many circumstances will be disproportionate. Much of the current law was established in commercial cases in the 18th and 19th centuries. At that time there was no mass market for insurance. Types of cover commonly bought by consumers today, such as household and motor insurance, simply did not exist. Insurance was typically arranged face-to-face rather than by telephone or over the internet. It is perhaps not surprising that unjust results are produced when old commercial rules are applied to modern consumer insurance contracts.

Take,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll